The Hubble constant is used to determine the rate of expansion of the universe. There are two different methods of determining the Hubble constant. And the two methods yield different results. Besides that, these two methods don’t come with the same results.
After two different types of results, physicists are going to create new rules about the cosmic. In that case, it is still not entirely certain how it will be done.
As scientists study cosmology, they encounter new uncertainties. Many things can no longer be explained according to the traditional methods of physics.
Scientists have entered a new era in the study of cosmology. Scientists have a clear understanding of all the parameters in cosmic evolution. Physicists have obtained important information about the age and density of the universe.
For scientists to come this far is quite a feat. The Hubble constant is one of the most important parameters in cosmology. Modern cosmology states that the universe is expanding continuously and is determined by a rate constant. This matter has to do with the age of the universe.
Initially, the value of the Hubble constant was 500. This means that the universe is quite young, even younger than the Sun. If this value is calculated according to the current formula, the age of the universe is further reduced. As a result, scientists have faced a dilemma.
Scientists are not yet sure what the next step might be. According to the Late Universe Method, the value of this constant is 74. On the other hand, according to the Early Universe Method, this value comes to 67. That is, the two methods yielded different results.
However, it is believed that through research, scientists will be able to get new and accurate results. Then the value of the Hubble constant could be somewhere between 67 and 14.
At present, the Late Universe method is more important. Because this method provides relatively accurate results from the Early Universe method.